Welcome to the section of our site where you may download our recent news items and publications or subscribe to our regular legal updates.
Practice area All Business - Banking Business - Brands Business - Commercial litigation & arbitration Business - Corporate Business - Corporate finance Business - Cultural assets & art Business - Employment Business - Funds, investments, tax & trusts Business - Hotels Business - Insolvency Business - IP, media & reputation management Business - Italy Business - Not-for-profit organizations Business - Real estate Business - Tax Personal - Cultural assets & art Personal - Divorce & family law Personal - Elder law Personal - Employment Personal - Family office & family business Personal - Italy Personal - Landed estates Personal - Litigation Personal - Philanthropy & charitable giving Personal - Probate & trust management Personal - Residential real estate Personal - Tax Personal - Trust & succession disputes Personal - Wealth structuring Personal - Wills & succession planning
Type of publication All Brochures Legal Updates and Articles News Newsletter
Published between 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Keywords
Search
25 May 2006
A Living Will is a document in which a person, whilst still mentally competent, requests and directs that certain measures should be adopted if and when he becomes incapable of taking responsibility for his own healthcare, ie by consenting to or refusing treatment. It is also often referred to as an advance directive.
No. It is clear from current case law that an instruction directive containing a refusal of treatment made in advance by a competent person is valid and should be respected by hospitals and other healthcare institutions. A patient does not have the same right to request treatment; decisions about the most appropriate treatment will be made by the senior doctor based on what would be in the patient's best interests. A proxy directive is not valid; it cannot operate as an ordinary power of attorney because it would cease to have effect when the donor lost mental capacity and cannot operate as an enduring power of attorney (which does not become invalid when the patient becomes mentally incapacitated) as case law specifically states that an EPA cannot authorise an attorney to take decisions in relation to a donor's healthcare.
When it is made by an adult who was mentally competent at the time when the directive was made and who also satisfies various other conditions relating principally to their having a clear understanding of the situation in which they anticipate that their directive will operate.
It seems that an otherwise valid refusal directive cannot include a provision which seeks to refuse basic care. Basic care includes warmth, shelter, pain relief, management of distressing symptoms, hygiene, feeding and hydration.
None are specified in law. However, it seems sensible for the directive to be in writing, signed by the donor and witnessed. If the donor has discussed the directive with their doctor before making it, it would be appropriate to include a statement to this effect in the directive itself.
Those who need to know of the directive's existence and terms should be given a copy. It would be sensible for one to be given to the donor's general practitioner, close members of their family and any specialist involved in their treatment.
The British Medical Association published a Code of Practice in April 1995 commending the development of Living Wills as documents which encourage doctors and patients to have more open discussions relating to a patient's healthcare. The Code of Practice stated that valid refusal directives must be followed by hospitals and that healthcare professionals who disregarded the terms of a valid refusal directive might be legally liable unless the refusal was of basic care. It was therefore recommended that healthcare professionals acted with increased care and attention in a situation where a directive was likely to exist. The Code of Practice is, however, voluntary and has not to date been widely adopted.
There are no set legal provisions for revoking a directive and therefore withdrawing the original and all copies and substituting a new directive is probably all that needs to be done.
Yes. The Act provides for the making of "advance decisions". These are very like advance directives to refuse medical treatment and broadly work in the same way with similar limitations. It is, however, now possible to appoint an attorney to make certain kinds of healthcare decisions for you. There are limitations on this however and advice should be taken on the terms of an advance decision.
No. It will not apply until April 2007. You should, however, review any existing advance directive in good time before the Act comes into force in case changes are needed.
Julia Abrey
DD: +44 (0)20 7597 6053
Email me