Welcome to the section of our site where you may download our recent news items and publications or subscribe to our regular legal updates.
Practice area All Business - Banking Business - Brands Business - Commercial litigation & arbitration Business - Corporate Business - Corporate finance Business - Cultural assets & art Business - Employment Business - Funds, investments, tax & trusts Business - Hotels Business - Insolvency Business - IP, media & reputation management Business - Italy Business - Not-for-profit organizations Business - Real estate Business - Tax Personal - Cultural assets & art Personal - Divorce & family law Personal - Elder law Personal - Employment Personal - Family office & family business Personal - Italy Personal - Landed estates Personal - Litigation Personal - Philanthropy & charitable giving Personal - Probate & trust management Personal - Residential real estate Personal - Tax Personal - Trust & succession disputes Personal - Wealth structuring Personal - Wills & succession planning
Type of publication All Brochures Legal Updates and Articles News Newsletter
Published between 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Keywords
Search
01 October 2008
A centuries-old tradition is coming to end in the courts of England and Wales. Judges at all levels will no longer wear wigs whilst hearing civil court cases. Gone too will be a style of dress that dates back even further.
Court dress has traditionally been worn by judges when presiding in open court. Advocates appearing before a ‘robed' judge are expected also to be ‘robed' (and ‘bewigged'). Current court dress is elaborate. For example, High Court judges have about five different styles of court dress, one of which dates back to the time of Edward III (1327-77) and was based on the correct dress for attending the royal court. Wigs, on the other hand, are a relatively recent arrival, only being fully adopted by the judiciary in about 1685 (at which time they were the height of fashion outside the court room as well). Although many TV shows and cartoons might give a different picture, the full bottomed wig has been reserved for ceremonial use only since the 1840s.
From 1st October this year, all civil court judges will wear a simple robe, designed by Betty Jackson, their rank distinguished only by the colour of the bands draped around the robe. This replaces the various colours of summer and winter gowns, some with fur, the tippet (sash) and the wing collars and white bands. No longer will the High Court judge be dressing according to the season or the saints day or the particular jurisdiction he or she is exercising that day.
Although the traditional horse hair wig will no longer be worn in the civil courts, the criminal court judges are keeping their wigs on, whilst adopting a simpler gown.
The changes come after a prolonged period of debate and consultation. Views remained polarised as to whether wigs and gowns added solemnity and anonymity or simply looked outdated and intimidating.
The head of the judiciary had expressed the wish that advocates in court should similarly de-wig. The Bar Council of England & Wales, which speaks for the majority of advocates, has declined to follow suit and barristers will still don their wigs wherever court dress is deemed appropriate.
Nicola Haye
DD: +44 (0)20 7597 6389
Email me
Peter Wood
DD: +44 (0)20 7597 6106