Welcome to the section of our site where you may download our recent news items and publications or subscribe to our regular legal updates.
Practice area All Business - Banking Business - Brands Business - Commercial litigation & arbitration Business - Corporate Business - Corporate finance Business - Cultural assets & art Business - Employment Business - Funds, investments, tax & trusts Business - Hotels Business - Insolvency Business - IP, media & reputation management Business - Italy Business - Not-for-profit organizations Business - Real estate Business - Tax Personal - Cultural assets & art Personal - Divorce & family law Personal - Elder law Personal - Employment Personal - Family office & family business Personal - Italy Personal - Landed estates Personal - Litigation Personal - Philanthropy & charitable giving Personal - Probate & trust management Personal - Residential real estate Personal - Tax Personal - Trust & succession disputes Personal - Wealth structuring Personal - Wills & succession planning
Type of publication All Brochures Legal Updates and Articles News Newsletter
Published between 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Keywords
Search
23 September 2008
In force from 1 October 2008
These rules provide the basis for proceedings at the Company Names Tribunal that consider objections to a company's registered name/the registration of a company. They provide for protection against opportunistic company name registrations which can be similar to opportunistic cyber-squatting. Its procedure is similar to the existing cyber-squatting procedures.
These rules apply if someone has registered a company name at Companies House in order to obtain money from you or prevent you from registering a company or trading name. In these cases you may be able to make an application to the Tribunal to have the name changed or struck-off the register. In order to succeed you must be able to shown that the registration was made opportunistically.
An example of opportunistic company name registration is when someone registers one or more variations of a name of your company in order to get you to buy the registrations, or to take advantage of your company's standing. Another example may be where someone knows a merger or take-over is about to take place and therefore registers one or more variations of the name that the newly formed commercial entity is likely to require.
A complaint is made through an application to the Tribunal under sections 69 (1)(a) and (b) of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). The applicant must show the offending name is identical to its own business or company name or is so similar that people are likely to be mislead. The other side must show one of a number of defences to defeat the claim. The claim must fall within section 69 of the CA 2000 which provides for a very limited set of circumstances.
There must have been an opportunistic registration. The Tribunal cannot deal with complaints where you feel that another company name is too similar to your own company name but there is no suspected opportunism behind the registration. In this situation, Companies House deals with the complaint under current rules.
Alternatively you may be able to use trade mark or passing off remedies to defend your company or trading name. We strongly recommend that you always register your main company or trading name as a trade mark. This will give you the strongest protection for your business name against opportunistic registrations, cyber squatting and general trading.
The CA 2006 lists several defences to applications to the Tribunal, which include:-
If the application is successful, the adjudicator will order that the company name registrations change to a name which does not cause offence. If the registration holder refuses to do this, the company name adjudicator has the power to order the Registrar of Companies to change the name to a name of the adjudicator's choosing. The Tribunal also has the power to order the losing party to pay some or all of the costs of the other party.
You can only appeal a decision of the Tribunal to the courts.
Conan Chitham
DD: +44 (0)20 7597 6577
Email me