Welcome to the section of our site where you may download our recent news items and publications or subscribe to our regular legal updates.
Practice area All Business - Banking Business - Brands Business - Commercial litigation & arbitration Business - Corporate Business - Corporate finance Business - Cultural assets & art Business - Employment Business - Funds, investments, tax & trusts Business - Hotels Business - Insolvency Business - IP, media & reputation management Business - Italy Business - Not-for-profit organizations Business - Real estate Business - Tax Personal - Cultural assets & art Personal - Divorce & family law Personal - Elder law Personal - Employment Personal - Family office & family business Personal - Italy Personal - Landed estates Personal - Litigation Personal - Philanthropy & charitable giving Personal - Probate & trust management Personal - Residential real estate Personal - Tax Personal - Trust & succession disputes Personal - Wealth structuring Personal - Wills & succession planning
Type of publication All Brochures Legal Updates and Articles News Newsletter
Published between 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Keywords
Search
01 March 2007
Prior to the enactment of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 ("PPA"), owners of artwork faced substantial monetary penalties if their artwork was incorrectly valued for tax purposes. Appraisers also faced penalties if their appraisals "aided and abetted" an understatement of tax liability. The PPA has increased the potential penalties against owners of artwork for inaccurate appraisals, and has added a new section to the Internal Revenue Code which imposes an additional penalty against appraisers who over value or under value property. New standards have also been created with regard to the qualifications of art appraisers and the contents of written appraisals made for purposes of substantiating charitable contributions of property.
The standard for valuing property for US income, gift and estate tax purposes is essentially the same. The value of property is the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither of whom is under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having knowledge of relevant facts. For income tax purposes the taxpayer's bias is always toward a higher valuation as such a valuation increases the charitable deduction. For gift and estate tax purposes, the bias is for a lower valuation, as that would minimize estate or gift tax. Although the valuation of property must generally be done by a competent appraiser for tax purposes, the taxpayer is held responsible for inappropriate valuations.
In preparing appraisals of personal property for tax purposes most appraisers take guidance from the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) published by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation. The USPAP rules prescribe a methodology for conducting an appraisal, including the use of comparable sales, and set forth guidelines for the content of written appraisals. Although the USPAP rules are not binding on the IRS, the IRS has increasingly been making reference to those rules in determining whether a well reasoned appraisal of property has been made.
The PPA lowers the threshold for imposing accuracy-related penalties on donors for "substantial" and "gross" valuation misstatements. The penalty tax rates imposed on donors continue to be 20% of the tax underpayment resulting from a substantial valuation misstatement and 40% of the underpayment resulting from a gross misstatement.
For income tax purposes, the threshold for determining whether a penalty is imposed on donors for substantial valuation misstatements is reduced to 150% (from 200%) of the correct value as determined by the IRS. For example, a penalty will be triggered if the donor values a gift to charity as $150,000, where the correct value is $100,000. For estate and gift tax purposes, the threshold for a substantial valuation misstatement is increased to 65% (from 50%) of the correct value. For example, a penalty will be triggered if the property left to a child is valued at $1,000,000 for estate or gift tax purposes, where the correct value is $1,538,500.
For income tax purposes, the threshold for determining whether a penalty is imposed on donors for gross valuation misstatements is reduced to 200% (from 400%) of the correct value as determined by the IRS. For estate and gift tax purposes, the threshold is increased to 40% (from 25%) of the correct value.
In addition, the PPA eliminates the "reasonable cause" defense in the case of gross valuation misstatements for both income tax and gift and estate tax purposes.
Under prior law, appraisers were subject to a penalty for aiding and abetting an understatement of a donor's tax liability. The penalty on an appraiser was a flat $1,000 ($10,000 if a corporate tax return was involved). Under the PPA, appraisers are now subject to additional penalties under Code Section 6695A. Under this new Code section, the penalty is the greater of $1,000 or 10% of the amount of tax attributable to a substantial or gross valuation misstatement, up to a maximum of 125% of the gross appraisal fee received by the appraiser. The penalty is imposed if the appraiser knew or reasonably should have known that the appraisal would be used in connection with a tax return and the claimed value of the property which is based on the appraisal is considered a substantial or gross valuation misstatement. There is a limited exception to the penalty if the Secretary of the Treasury determines that the value established in the appraisal is more likely than not to be the correct value.
As under prior law, appraisers can be barred from practice before the Department of Treasury or IRS after notice and a hearing based upon inappropriate valuations.
The PPA has changed the definition of a qualified appraisal for income tax purposes by refining the definition of who is a qualified appraiser and requiring that a qualified appraisal be prepared in accordance with generally accepted appraisal standards. The new law defines a qualified appraiser as an individual who:
Under existing regulations that remain in effect, the following persons cannot be a qualified appraiser:
A qualified appraisal must contain the following elements which remain unchanged by the PPA:
Since the new PPA rules take effect for tax returns filed after August 17, 2006, both appraisers and any other persons involved with a transfer of art in the calendar year 2006 should make sure that they seek advice as to whether they are effected by the new legislation.
Paul M. Roy
DD: +1 203 974 0332
Email me