The Charity Commission has published its case report on the charity Nice Time which provides recreational facilities to advance the physical education of children and young people. Two of the trustees were benefiting from payments made by the charity's subsidiary. One trustee was paid to serve as the managing director of the subsidiary and the other, a qualified accountant, had received payments for financial assistance provided to the charity by his accountancy practice.
Unauthorised personal benefits are a serious cause for concern and trustees who act improperly may have to repay the funds to the charity. The Charity Commission found that the payments were unauthorised as the charity's governing document prohibited trustee benefits and the trustees had not sought permission to make the payment from the Charity Commission or the courts. However, the Charity Commission also recognised that the charity had acted swiftly by ceasing the payments, appointing independent trustees and by the trustee acting as managing director stepping down from his roles as both trustee and managing director.
The Charity Commission advised the newly appointed trustees of the charity to:
1. Formally review the payments to decide whether they were made in good faith and in the best interests of the charity; and
2. Amend the charity's governing document to allow trustees to be paid for goods and services.
The independent trustees concluded that the payments were reasonable, necessary for the charity to operate and had been made in good faith. They also concluded that the funds had not been misused and, therefore, that it was not necessary for the funds to be recovered. The Charity Commission found that the independent trustees had gone through a proper decision making process and supported their findings.
Ultimately, when deciding whether to pay or employ a trustee, it is important to:
1. Make sure you have the necessary authority to do so;
2. Recognise that payments to trustees, even when authorised, create a conflict of interest which should be handled appropriately; and
3. Ensure that it can be demonstrated that the payment is clearly in the best interest of the charity.
Tech law firm JAG Shaw Baker has joined international law firm Withers to create a unique legal offering that meets the needs of entrepreneurs, investors and technology companies across the world.
We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. If you continue, we'll assume you're happy to receive all cookies on this site. However, you may change your cookie settings at any time.
Practices
Banking and finance Commercial litigation Corporate Divorce and family Employment Immigration International arbitration IP and data protection Private client Real estate Tax Trust, estate and inheritance disputes
Clients
Families and their advisors Beneficiaries and heirs Elderly and vulnerable people Families and family offices Trustees, executors and fiduciaries Institutions and businesses Charities and non-profit Family businesses Government Public companies Private companies Successful people High net worth individuals Leaders and senior executives Owners and entrepreneurs Professional advisors Talent and creatives
Areas of focus
Art Luxury Brands Construction Energy Farms and estates Fashion Financial services Food and drink Hotels and hospitality Insurance companies Life sciences Luxury assets Media and reputation Pharmaceuticals Philanthropy Sponsorship Sport Technology
Region
Asia Pacific North America South America Europe Russia and CIS Middle East Africa
18 February 2016
Charity Commission comments on unauthorised trustee benefits
Alison Paines
Partner | UK
Share
The Charity Commission has published its case report on the charity Nice Time which provides recreational facilities to advance the physical education of children and young people. Two of the trustees were benefiting from payments made by the charity's subsidiary. One trustee was paid to serve as the managing director of the subsidiary and the other, a qualified accountant, had received payments for financial assistance provided to the charity by his accountancy practice.
Unauthorised personal benefits are a serious cause for concern and trustees who act improperly may have to repay the funds to the charity. The Charity Commission found that the payments were unauthorised as the charity's governing document prohibited trustee benefits and the trustees had not sought permission to make the payment from the Charity Commission or the courts. However, the Charity Commission also recognised that the charity had acted swiftly by ceasing the payments, appointing independent trustees and by the trustee acting as managing director stepping down from his roles as both trustee and managing director.
The Charity Commission advised the newly appointed trustees of the charity to:
1. Formally review the payments to decide whether they were made in good faith and in the best interests of the charity; and
2. Amend the charity's governing document to allow trustees to be paid for goods and services.
The independent trustees concluded that the payments were reasonable, necessary for the charity to operate and had been made in good faith. They also concluded that the funds had not been misused and, therefore, that it was not necessary for the funds to be recovered. The Charity Commission found that the independent trustees had gone through a proper decision making process and supported their findings.
Ultimately, when deciding whether to pay or employ a trustee, it is important to:
1. Make sure you have the necessary authority to do so;
2. Recognise that payments to trustees, even when authorised, create a conflict of interest which should be handled appropriately; and
3. Ensure that it can be demonstrated that the payment is clearly in the best interest of the charity.
Category: Article
Client types: Charities and non-profit
Focus areas
Charities and non profit
Insight
View all Firm insight09 December 2019 - Video
Liberal Democrats proposed tax changes
09 December 2019 - Article
AI, IoT and Blockchain: Using the power of three to create business, legal and technical solutions
09 December 2019 - Article
2020 in family law: Why cohabitants need legal reform
09 December 2019 - Article
Italian regulation of high value sports content under the EU's AVMS Directive
09 December 2019 - Article
SNP manifesto – one goal in mind
09 December 2019 - Article
Distributions from foreign opaque trusts: new tax rules for Italian beneficiaries
05 December 2019 - Podcast
Art: Divorce and the division of assets
04 December 2019 - Article
Labour's plans for Corporate Governance
03 December 2019 - Article
UK general election 2019: What are the three main parties proposing on employment and employment rights?
03 December 2019 - Article
End of the line for Entrepreneur's Relief?