- Education: University of California, Berkeley, B.A. Political Science • Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, J.D.
- Admitted: California, 2004 • England and Wales, 2008
- Languages spoken: Spanish • French
- Year joined: 2008
Geoff qualified in California in 2004 and was a litigator in San Francisco for three years before qualifying in England in 2008 and joining Withers LLP's contentious trust and succession team.
Geoff advises fiduciaries and beneficiaries, as well as creditors or adverse claimants, regarding domestic or multi-jurisdictional trust matters. Also, he frequently advises on the validity of wills, including fraud, capacity, undue influence, construction, rectification, constructive trusts, proprietary estoppel, and claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
While he was in law school, Geoff clerked in the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, conducting committal proceedings for felonies including armed robbery and vehicular manslaughter.
Geoff has been recognised as a 'Rising Star' by Thomson Reuters in its 2013 London Super Lawyers list.
- In The Matter of the A Trust  JRC 169A, Geoff and Dawn Goodman acted for the successful beneficiaries in this matter, where the Royal Court of Jersey made new law on the scope of the duties of trust protectors and the grounds on which they may be removed from office. The Royal Court found that, as with trustees, the correct test for removal of a protector arises from Letterstedt v Broers. Due not only to the protector’s misunderstanding his duties to his beneficiaries but also his failure to keep a watchful eye on the trustee’s management of the trusts, the Royal Court suspended his powers and removed him from office. Click here to read our briefing note on this case.
- AB Jnr & Or v MB & Ors (December 2012, citation forthcoming), Geoff and Ziva Robertson acted for the defendant trustees of a Cayman Islands trust. The Plaintiffs alleged the trustees committed breach of trust through material non-disclosure; the proceedings included a counterclaim seeking forfeiture of the Second Plaintiff's interest. After a ten week trial, the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands issued a landmark decision setting its guidelines (and making new law) on issues such as the remedy of equitable compensation, the fair dealing rule, and the operation of forfeiture clauses in trust deeds. The decision also provides invaluable insight on questions of estoppel, laches, and acquiescence and will influence succession and trust disputes for years to come. The matter involved substantial worldwide assets and complex valuation and cross-jurisdictional issues concerning disclosure, confidentiality, third-party rights and privilege.
- In Ullmann-Jones v Wolfe and others (2009), Geoff and Paul Hewitt acted for the deceased's two daughters who challenged their father's last will (signed shortly before death) which placed his estate in the control of non-family trustees including their father's co-habitee. The daughters argued that their father lacked testamentary capacity and, alternatively, that he did not know and approve its contents. The co-habitee and her fellow trustees conceded in advance of trial despite three solicitors preparing witness statements in support of the will; the daughters secured virtually the entire estate for the family outright.
- In the Matter of D  CILR 432, Geoff and Ziva Robertson acted in a leading Cayman decision regarding the test for the exercise of powers on behalf of an incapacitated person. The decision established an objective "best interests" test instead of the previous subjective "lucid interval" test, despite the absence of legislative amendments such as those found in The Mental Capacity Act 2005 for England and Wales.
- In the Matter of the Z Trust  CILR 593, Geoff and Ziva Robertson were involved in a landmark Cayman decision, now approved by the English Court of Appeal, which was the first authority for the proposition that a trust fund may be divided into distinct shares on grounds of expediency rather than constitute a variation of the trust. The process is therefore quicker and simpler since neither consent of all beneficiaries is required nor must the court apply the more stringent "best interests" test.
Publications and speaking engagements
- Speaker on Dealing with Difficult Executors, Legacy Labyrinth (February 2013)
- Speaker on Landmark Cases and the Charity Sector, Legacy Labyrinth (February 2012)
- Speaker at The Solicitors Group's Wills and Probate Conference: Lost, Stolen and Damaged Wills and Trusts Under Attack! (October 2011)
- Speaker on Landmark Cases and the Charity Sector, Legacy Labyrinth (February 2011)
- Co-presenter at Trusts Under Attack - Protecting Your Family's Structure (November 2010, Geneva/Zurich)
- Co-presenter at Resolution London's Matrimonial Property Regimes seminar (June 2010)
- Speaker on Developments in the Cayman Islands at An Offshore Trust Review (April 2010, Geneva/Zurich)
- Speaker on Remedies Against Executors and Trustees for Loss on Investments, Legacy Labyrinth (February 2010)
- Speaker on Forgery, Fraud and Destruction - What to Do When the Will Is Suppressed, Legacy Labyrinth (February 2009)
- Contributor to the quarterly legal update for the Institute of Legacy Management
- Author, Multi-billion dollar disputed estate will not go to the dogs. Read more
- Author, 'Federal Statutory Interpretation in Contravention of State Law Violates Principles of Federalism', reprinted in Domestic Preparedness: Law, Policy, and National Security 2012
- Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists (ACTAPS), Associate Member
- California State Bar (Member, Trusts and Estates Section)
- Society of English and American Lawyers
On a personal note
Geoff's interests include deep-sea fishing, following American and English football, and cooking. He is also a proud alumnus of the University of California, Berkeley, and is President of the Berkeley Club of London.