Paul Hewitt

Partner | London

Paul is a partner in the trust, estate and inheritance disputes team.

Top ranked in the directories, Paul is described as a ‘star litigator’ and ‘a formidable opponent’; as well as listed in The Lawyer’s Hot 100 2020.

Paul specialises in all types of trust and probate disputes. This includes claims about the validity, construction and rectification of wills and trusts, Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 claims, removal of executors and trustees, and contentious estate and trust administrations.

The Court has appointed him administrator in a number of contentious estates. A barrister interviewed by the leading independent legal directories commented: ‘if I were a client with a contentious trusts or probate claim, I would, without hesitation, go to Paul’.

Paul also advises on contentious Court of Protection matters, both financial, and health and welfare, involving those unable to manage their own affairs. These include statutory will applications and disputes over the appointment or conduct of attorneys and deputies. Occasionally he acts as a ‘litigation friend’.

He also advises on professional negligence claims arising out of trust and estate administration, and failed estate and tax planning.

Paul Hewitt enjoys an excellent reputation for his work on complex private client disputes. "There is a uniquely commercial aspect to his work and he is exceptional at judging whether something is worth running," observes one source. Another comments: "He really knows what he’s doing and is absolutely determined to do the best with his clients."

The Lawyer says "There aren’t too many lawyers who can claim to have acted in a case spanning more than 70 years concerning two countries, a bank and a former state. However, that is precisely what Paul Hewitt did when representing the 8th Nizam in High Commissioner for Pakistan In the United Kingdom v Prince Muffakham Jah & Ors last year, a dispute linked to a £1m fee that eventually ballooned to £35m."

He heads the firm’s work for charities and not-for-profit organisations on legacy income with Stephen Richards.

Secretary Abigail Joyce


Paul provided clear, intelligible advice and answered questions readily and accurately, and the trustee body was content that he be our lead contact throughout the months of this contentious issue. The Royal Society is grateful for the assiduous work that Paul and Katie Emerson put in to bring the matter to a successful conclusion.

Dr Julie Maxton, Executive Director - The Royal Society

Thank you to you [Paul] and your team for all your help & guidance. Your involvement in a number of our cases has proved invaluable.

Kate Wilson, Legacy Administrator - Princess Alice Hospice

Over the years we have come to rely on Paul Hewitt and his colleagues for their proactive and value-added legal advice deeply rooted in their thorough understanding of our work. I have always found their style and approach to be responsive, effective and efficient with the expertise and experience to provide the highest level of legal service allowing us to make informed decisions.

Miss Mojdeh Zand, Head of Legacy Administration - RSPB

I went to Withers because I was told they were the best in this field. I was not disappointed. It’s not just about good lawyering, although that of course is vital. It’s about working with us and listening to find out the full circumstances of the issue. I found Paul Hewitt and Natasha Stourton to be sympathetic and practical. They didn’t over promise and gave us a fair and realistic view of our chances. I felt like we were all a team with a common goal.

Peter Burgess

As a New Yorker newly resident in London, I have found Paul Hewitt of enormous assistance during the challenging time after my husband’s passing. Paul’s expertise, high morals, and absolutely peerless work ethic were a strong foundation and comfort during an extremely difficult and unsettling time. He and his team worked tirelessly to ensure my well-being and future on all levels when faced with hostile and aggressive opposition. I am deeply, deeply grateful to all of them.

Paulina Moggach

Thank you [Paul] for the effort and perseverance and guidance…I was lucky to have a good firm with great lawyers onside to reach a conclusion, top notch firm without a doubt and you were right when you said ‘leave it to us’.


The ‘outstanding’ Paul Hewitt is widely regarded as a ‘brilliant and innovative litigator’ with a particular focus on legacy and trustee disputes. One impressed source calls Hewitt ‘effervescent and full of ideas.’

Chambers UK 2018, London

Paul Hewitt is a peerless litigator with a remarkable capacity for tactical invention.

Legal 500 UK, 2020

There is a uniquely commercial aspect to his work and he is exceptional at judging whether something is worth running. He really knows what he’s doing and is absolutely determined to do the best with his clients.

Chambers HNW, 2020

Paul Hewitt is an excellent lawyer and tactician. He never loses sight of what is best for his clients but he fights for them ceaselessly.

Legal 500 UK, 2021


Track record





Paul and Deborah Nicholls-Carr represent Prince Mukarram Jah, His Exalted Highness Nizam VIII of Hyderabad, in a dispute over funds frozen at Natwest Bank for over 70 years (the subject of a 1958 House of Lords decision Rahimtoola v Nizam of Hyderabad), involving the governments of India and Pakistan. Pakistan issued a new claim in 2013. The High Court decided in Pakistan v Natwest and Ors [2015] EWHC 55 (Ch) that the Nizam’s claim to the funds should be allowed to proceed. The Judge upheld the Nizam’s claim (along with those of his younger brother and India) to his grandfather’s funds. Read the Judgment here. The case was one of The Lawyer’s ‘Top 20 Cases of 2019’.

Paul and Alexandra Dix act for Mrs Bhusate in her claim for financial provision from her late husband’s estate. In the particular circumstances (summarised in his judgment) Chief Master Marsh ordered that Mrs Bhusate should be allowed to bring her claim more than 25 years after her husband passed away (the previous record of just under six years was set in 1993). In January 2020 the High Court upheld Chief Master Marsh’s decision (the appeal judgment here) meaning Mrs Bhusate’s claim can now proceed. Click here to read our briefing note.

Paul and Sarah Aughwane represent Mrs Cowan in her claim for reasonable financial provision from the estate of her late husband. In July 2019 the Court of Appeal unanimously gave her permission to bring her claim notwithstanding it having been issued out of time. Here is a link to the Court of Appeal Judgment and to our article. Trial is due at the end of July 2020.

England and Wales, 1997

‘Inheritance Act Claims’, Law Society - second edition, co-author, 2017

‘Probate Disputes and Remedies’, Jordans third edition - March 2014, co-author

Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists

Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners

Law Society Private Client Section

Charity Law Association

International Association of Young Lawyers

Solicitors for the Elderly

Contentious Trust and Probate Ceremony - James v James - 8 February 2018

The Law Society Private Client Cross Border Conference 2016, Cross Border Contentious Probate

Law Society, Will drafting post Illot v Mitson - 9 October 2015

Me in a minute

I love the challenge of my specialist area

I wanted to be a lawyer since I was about ten even though I don’t think we knew any lawyers. As my wife and colleagues know only too well I enjoy a good debate and if I hadn’t gone into the law, I would most probably have pursued a career in politics.

I love the challenge of my specialist area. Disputes about wills and trusts require detailed knowledge of the law but they also require strategic planning, detective work and understanding of the family emotions that often drive discord, as well as commercial common sense.

Probably my highest profile case is acting for His Exalted Highness the VIII Nizam of Hyderabad over the ownership of £35 million his grandfather deposited with NatWest bank in 1948 (the money is also claimed by the governments of India and Pakistan).

The case I am proudest of is Burgess v Hawes - a finely balanced probate dispute where our preparation tipped the balance in a winner takes all scenario.

I act for a whole variety of charities, as well as individuals, some high profile. I am very proud of my record in resolving the vast majority of disputes without putting clients through the risk, stress and expense of going to court.



  • English






20 Old Bailey,



View Office

Regularly works with...