US Corporate Law News: Supreme Court finds anti-steering provisions do not violate the Sherman Act

8 July 2018 | Applicable law: US

On June 25, 2018, the Supreme Court held that a contractual provision between American Express ("Amex") and merchants that accept Amex credit cards, which forbids such merchants from suggesting that customers use competing credit cards that charge lower merchant fees — a process known as "anti-steering" — is not an anticompetitive vertical restraint on competition. 

In Ohio v. American Express, the Department of Justice and several States sued Amex, alleging that, absent this provision imposed by Amex, merchants may have an economic incentive to "steer" or otherwise incentivize customers to use other credit cards with lower merchant fees. In reaching its conclusion, the Court determined that merchants and consumers constitute a single relevant credit card market in which the effects of Amex's actions must be examined. The scope of the applicable market examined by the Court represents a departure from traditional antitrust analysis, where consumer and merchant markets are distinct.

For more information see here.

This article was written with contributions from Tim Moore.

This document (and any information accessed through links in this document) is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related experience

As a full-service law firm, we are able to provide advice and information about a wide range of other issues. Here are some related areas.

Join the club

We have lots more news and information that you'll find informative and useful. Let us know what you're interested in and we'll keep you up to date on the issues that matter to you.