US Corporate Law News: recent ruling reopens federal court for climate tort litigation

18 March 2018 | Applicable law: US

U.S. District Judge William H. Alsup ruled that San Francisco and Oakland California's claims, which alleged that Exxon, BP and other fossil fuel producers are liable for global warming, should be governed under federal, not state, law.

Judge Alsup drew distinction between the current claim and the U.S. Supreme Court's 2011 ruling in American Electric Power Co. Inc. v. Connecticut and the Ninth Circuit's 2012 ruling in Native Village of Kivalina et al. v ExxonMobil Corp. et al., stating that those rulings only addressed greenhouse gas emitters, not producers like the oil companies in the current claim. As a result of this ruling, oil companies get their wish of keeping climate cases in federal court, which has a higher bar for establishing standing, while cities now have access to federal courts and a judge who appears prepared to address climate change issues in courts.

For more information, see California v. BP P.L.C., No. C 17-06011 WHA, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32990 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2018).

This document (and any information accessed through links in this document) is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related experience

As a full-service law firm, we are able to provide advice and information about a wide range of other issues. Here are some related areas.

Join the club

We have lots more news and information that you'll find informative and useful. Let us know what you're interested in and we'll keep you up to date on the issues that matter to you.